Lindh v. City of Venice
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant Lindh requests that this court reverse the trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1981), for lack of a justiciable issue of either law or fact. We find this issue is without merit. The appellee City of Venice objects to the lower court’s order awarding costs to appellant. Insofar as the City of Venice was required to pay the travel expenses incurred by Lindh in taking depositions and the costs of copies of depositions, the order as to costs is reversed. See Professional Computer Management, Inc. v. Tampa Wholesale Liquor Co.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- PROF. COMPUTER MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Tampa Wholesale Liquor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. SampaioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Ryan v. BeucherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. VoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985