Legal Opinion
Grimmett v. Dace
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 28, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-13704PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND AWARD ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS (ECF # 7) AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF # 8)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
After his condominium flooded in 2009, Plaintiff Michael C. Grimmett (“Grim-mett”) sought legal assistance from the UAW-GM ‘ Legal Services Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan is an employee benefit program provided to certain union members pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The Plan’s attorneys ultimately represented Grimmett in a lawsuit against his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. Plastipak Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Johnson v. Highmark Health, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Ranney v. DolgencorpDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025