Chambers v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
By petition for writ of mandate plaintiffs seek relief from an order of the trial court granting defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ law firm from further representing plaintiffs in the underlying action.
Confronting us is an issue of first impression in this state on vicarious disqualification of a former government employee’s current law firm. We view the issue in light of substantial countervailing policy concerns and conclude that vicarious disqualification under the facts of this case was unwarranted and an abuse of discretion.
On January 23, 1978, petitioners,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- William H. Raley Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shadonna C.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Paul E. Iacono Structural Engineer, Inc. v. Robert R. Humphrey, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.