Legal Opinion

Mathisen v. Mathisen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1979No. Civ. 9487PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Carol J. Mathisen appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion to modify a judgment and decree that granted Harold J. Mathisen a divorce from her. We affirm.

Mr. Mathisen commenced a divorce action against Mrs. Mathisen in October 1976, based upon alleged irreconcilable differences existing between them. His complaint was personally served on Mrs. Mathi-sen on October 9, 1976. The body of his complaint comprised eleven numbered allegations, ,he most important of which for purposes of this appeal are the following:

“4.
“That one child has been born to the marriage, .

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Voskuil v. VoskuilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Odegard v. OdegardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Guthmiller v. GuthmillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tiokasin v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Vande Hoven v. Vande HovenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API