Mathisen v. Mathisen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Carol J. Mathisen appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion to modify a judgment and decree that granted Harold J. Mathisen a divorce from her. We affirm.
Mr. Mathisen commenced a divorce action against Mrs. Mathisen in October 1976, based upon alleged irreconcilable differences existing between them. His complaint was personally served on Mrs. Mathi-sen on October 9, 1976. The body of his complaint comprised eleven numbered allegations, ,he most important of which for purposes of this appeal are the following:
“4.
“That one child has been born to the marriage, .
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Voskuil v. VoskuilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Odegard v. OdegardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Guthmiller v. GuthmillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Tiokasin v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Vande Hoven v. Vande HovenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.