Legal Opinion

Roth v. Filipek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

On this appeal we have concluded that the proceeds of the bank account are the property of Mr. Roth, and that the cash found in the safe-deposit box is an asset of Mrs. Roth’s estate.

The Bank Account.

The contract theory of joint bank accounts, adopted by this court in Estate of Staver (1935), 218 Wis. 114, 260 N. W. 655, relies on the contract of deposit rather than delivery of evidence of the chose in action for the perfection of the joint interests of donee and donor depositors. “The instrument in legal contemplation vests ownership in a chose in action according to its terms. The joint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Staver v. StaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kelberger v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pfeifer v. PfeiferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Zander v. HollyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Plainse v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Estate of StametsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Estate of MichaelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Johnson v. MielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Trecker v. TreckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API