Legal Opinion

Bowles v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1923No. 13599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by the state against R. P. Bowles, as defendant, seeking to remove the defendant from the office of mayor of the city of Durant, in Bryan county.

The prosecution was instituted after the defendant had been charged by accusation of the grand jury with various offenses. The accusation contained five counts, to each of which the defendant demurred, which demurrer was by the court overruled. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence as to counts Nos. 4 and 5, but overruled said demurrer as to counts Nos. 1, 2, and 3.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Bradford v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  3. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Garrett v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Hinz v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API