D.G. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the juvenile D.G. from an adjudication of delinquency for grand theft, burglary of a conveyance, and malicious mischief. The sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying a defense motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree and affirm.
*296It is well settled in Florida that a person’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property gives rise to a permissible factual inference that the person in possession of such property is guilty of larceny or theft of the subject property, see Cone v. State, 69 So.2d 175 (Fla.1953); Byrd v. State, 146 Fla. 686, 689, 1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Burroughs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Cone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Youngs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- F.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993