Legal Opinion

D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 8, 1989No. 88-850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the juvenile D.G. from an adjudication of delinquency for grand theft, burglary of a conveyance, and malicious mischief. The sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying a defense motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree and affirm.

*296It is well settled in Florida that a person’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property gives rise to a permissible factual inference that the person in possession of such property is guilty of larceny or theft of the subject property, see Cone v. State, 69 So.2d 175 (Fla.1953); Byrd v. State, 146 Fla. 686, 689, 1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Burroughs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Cone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Youngs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. F.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API