Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Martz Concrete Co., Ca2006-06-067 (8-27-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2007No. CA2006-06-067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Martz Concrete Co., appeals a conviction in the Franklin Municipal Court for four violations of the Carlisle property maintenance code. We affirm appellant's conviction, but reverse and remand for sentencing.

{¶ 2} Appellant has owned the property located at 350 East Central Avenue in Carlisle since 1929, using the property as a site for its concrete business. In 1997, the property was annexed into the city of Carlisle. Beginning in 1999, officials from the city of Carlisle entered into discussions with appellant requesting that appellant rehabilitate the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. N. Olmstead v. RockOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. S.W. Ohio Basketball, Inc. v. HimesOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. White, 21795 (10-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API