Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Glidden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an appeal from a decree, entered in the Probate Court, denying a motion that issues be framed for jury trial in the matter of the petition for probate of an instrument purporting to be the last will of Herbert W. Dayton, late of Lynn, deceased. The motion embraced the issues of due execution, soundness of mind, and whether the instrument was procured to be executed by the fraud or undue influence of Lucy E. Dayton “her agents or attorneys or any of them, exercised upon the said Herbert W. Dayton.” The motion was heard by the judge upon statements of expected proof by counsel for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. SylviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Neill v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Hannon v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Crosby v. TracyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Logan v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Salkins v. SalkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Smolak v. KulpinskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API