Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1928No. File No. 6578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

D'efendant was convicted of using instruments upon a pregnant woman with intent to procure miscarriage, and appeals from: the judgment and an order denying a new trial. The sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict is not questioned.

The errors assigned are:

First. Refusal to quash the information on the ground of variance from the preliminary complaint. The complaint charged defendant with unlawfully -using certain instruments upon the person of a girl with intent to procure her miscarriage. The criticism *208is that it fails to .allege that the girl was pregnant and that what was done…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Seifert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. QuartierOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. CruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The People v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. PickusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API