Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Welfare of S.J.G.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1996No. C7-95-2073Published

1Dissent

RANDALL, Judge (Dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. The state simply failed to prove convincingly that public safety is not served by retaining this proceeding in juvenile court.

As the majority correctly points out, a juvenile court may order a juvenile certified as an adult only if the court finds that the presumption of certification does not apply, and the prosecutor has shown by clear and convincing evidence that retaining the proceeding in the juvenile court does not serve the public safety. Minn.Stat. § 260.125, subd. 2(6)(ii) (1994)(emphasis added). In determining whether public safety…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Welfare of DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re the Welfare of D.F.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re the Welfare of M.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API