Legal Opinion

Alvord Carriage Manufacturing Co. v. Gleason

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 15, 1869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Trover, reserved by the Superior Court on facts found for the advice of tbis court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPark, J.

The plaintiffs mortgaged a certain tract of land situated in the town of Torrington, together with a certain factory located thereon and all the fixed machinery contained in the factory. The mortgage was subsequently foreclosed, and all the interest of the mortgagee in the premises after the foreclosure was conveyed to the defendant. The controversy in the case is in regard to the ownership of the bell that was upon the factory, and the blower pipe leading from the blower to certain forges upon the premises for the purpose of conveying air from the blower to the forges.

The plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Capen v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Thomson v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1892
  5. Stockwell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API