Legal Opinion

Shofner, Administrator v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1940No. 4-6072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

Appellees are physicians who rendered professional services to their patient, Dalhoff, who died in 1934. The administrator’s approval of claims was followed by the probate court’s order of allowance. Because principal assets consisted of real estate for which there was not a satisfactory market, payment was delayed.

In June, 1938, Jones received $208.25. The remainder of his claim 1 was paid in September, 1939, when Compton was also paid in full. 2 Thereafter it was insisted in- and “paid in full” have reference to face values, exclusive of interest. terest was due from date of allowance by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. West v. WaddillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. James v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Scott v. PennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  4. Brown v. HanauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Jackson v. GormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Sharum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Johnson v. HazenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Southern Furniture Company v. Morgan.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Estate of Otto v. Estate FairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API