Legal Opinion

Matter of Pirie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for re-argument. (See 198 N. Y. 209.)

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

By a subsequent citation issued in these proceedings Frederick A. Wright, as administrator of the estate of Susan Wright, deceased, was brought in and made a party creditor in these proceedings and thereby he introduced in evidence a transcript of a judgment entered in Nassau county on November 8th, 1899, in favor of Susan Wright for $893.90 against A dele M. Downing.

I am of the opinion that under section 2J55 of the Code, Wright, as administrator, became a party to these proceedings and was thereupon entitled to prosecute the same, even though the original petitioner failed to establish his…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warfield v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Denniston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  3. Freedom Finance Co., Inc. v. SteeplesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Denniston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API