Legal Opinion
Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 23, 1968No. P68/18; protest 65/7333 (New York)Published
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of nylon mono-filament yam similar in all material respects'to those the subject of Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 532, C.D. 2695), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966