Santos v. Chappell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
The complaint was served upon the defendants on May 11, 1970. By written stipulation, the time in which defendants were required to answer the complaint was extended to June 5, 1970, with no specific reference to time for motions. On June 5,1970, defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint.
A motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]), must be made: “ at any time before service of the responsive pleading is required ”. (CPLR 3211, subd. [e].) A stipulation which extends the time in which to answer a complaint also extends the time in which to move,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Tatar v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002