Legal Opinion
Khaled Kassim v. City of Schenectady and Michael T. Brockbank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 18, 2005No. Docket 03-9283PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Khaled Kassim appeals from two judgments in his favor, one for damages, one for attorney’s fees, which plaintiff contends were insufficient. Kassim brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Schenectady (“City”) and its corporation counsel, Michael T. Brockbank (collectively “defendants”), alleging that defendants violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by evicting him from a property where he operated a convenience store, without prior notice or opportunity to be heard.
The United States District Court for the Northern…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Fisher v. SD Protection Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Barfield v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Townsend v. BENJAMIN ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Patterson v. BalsamicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.