Legal Opinion
United States v. American Optical Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 9, 1951No. Nos. 46 C 1333, 46 C 1332PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
On September 18, 1950 permission was given the government to file a supplemental complaint naming as “defendant successors” eighty-nine persons who acquired the dispensing business from branches, of *72the defendants American Optical Company and Bausch & Lomb, and who were continuing to engage in the dispensing business.
The alleged defendant successors, Dallas H. Holford, S. N. Key, Sr., and S. N. Key, Jr., have filed a motion to dismiss the supplemental complaint as to them on the grounds (1) it does not appear that the dispensing ■ business acquired by these defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Bates Valve Bag CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952