Legal Opinion
Mills v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 19, 2005No. 1D05-1585PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch*851field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burchfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006