Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 2005No. 1D05-1585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch*851field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burchfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006