Legal Opinion

Niagara University v. Trautman, King, Markwart Associates, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have dismissed plaintiffs causes of action against Sicoli & Massaro, Inc. (defendant). The record establishes that plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract on September 26, 1982, to replace the roof of the Seton Hall building on plaintiff’s campus. That contract was substantially completed on January 10, 1983, and final payment was received on June 20, 1983. On May 31, 1991, plaintiff commenced this action alleging negligence and breach of contract. Because the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. Celotex Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Cabrini Medical Center v. DesinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Murphy v. Wegman's Food Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Board of Education of Hudson City School District v. Thompson Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Bayridge Air Rights, Inc. v. Blitman Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API