Phœnix Knitting Works v. Rich
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Phoenix Knitting Works against Nathan J. Rich and others. On final hearing. Decree for defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
KILLITS, District Judge.
The complainant, the Phœnix Knitting Works, as assignee of design patent No. 39,347, for a neck scarf or muffler, granted June 9, 1908, sues the defendants Nathan J. Rich, Henry Rich, and Samuel S. Sampliner, as N. J. Rich & Co., in equity, for alleged infringements and accounting and injunction. The answer denies both infringement and validity of the patent as for a new and original design.
The patent in question was adjudicated in the case of the complainant versus Bradley Knitting Company, by the Circuit Court of the Eastern District of Wisconsin in an opinion by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Phœnix Knitting Works v. Bradley Knitting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
- James E. Tompkins Co. v. New York Woven Wire Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Ashley v. Samuel C. Tatum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. C. R. Anthony Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Phœnix Knitting Works v. RichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1911
- Tappan Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Phœnix Knitting Works v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Shure Incorporated v. Clearone, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020