Legal Opinion

Allina Health Services v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1463PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Medicare, a federal program that pays for health coverage for most Americans aged 65 and older is, to put it mildly, a complex program with reams of statutory provisions and regulations. Banking on this complexity to execute a fancy two-step, the Secretary of Health and Human Services excuses a lack of proper rulemaking and reasoned explanation for a new statutory interpretation of the reimbursement formula for certain hospitals serving low-income patients in the hopes that the Court will defer to her expertise. The Court recognizes both the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allina Health Services v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Stringfellow Mem'l Hosp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Allina Health Services v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Allina Health System v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API