Legal Opinion

Lykens v. Peters

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 2025No. 4:24-cv-01385Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SCOTT LYKENS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:24-cv-01385 v. (SAPORITO, J.) COLETTE S. PETERS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Now before the court is a report and recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom, in which he recommends that this action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to state court be denied as moot. Doc. 14. This action was originally commenced by the plaintiff in state court. Doc. 1-2. It was removed to this court by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API