Legal Opinion

Maximovich v. Highland Park State Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 134PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Webster (Arthur), J. Assumpsit by Samuel Maximovich against the Highland Park State Bank for money paid to defendant to be deposited for plaintiff in a foreign bank. Judgment for plaintiff non obstante veredicto for nominal damages only. He brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This case is similar to the case of Cechanowicz v. Highland Park State Bank, ante, 37. In the trial court it took the same course as did that case. The same questions are here raised and discussed as were raised and discussed in that case. The instant case is controlled by the opinion in that case.

The judgment will be reversed and the ease remanded with direction to enter judgment on the verdict. Plaintiff will have costs.

Wiest, C. J., and McDonald, Clark, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kolodig v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1924