State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Dyke, Chief Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Eric J. Smith, appeals his conviction for possession of criminal tools (R.C. 2923.24) and aggravated trafficking (R.C. 2925.03[A][7] ). 1
In his first assignment of error, appellant claims that the trial court impermis-sibly denied his Crim.R. 29 motion because the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for possession of criminal tools. In his second assignment of error, appellant claims that he proved entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence. Upon review we find that appellant’s first assignment of error has merit. For the reasons which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HurleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Schneider, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000