Legal Opinion

McAlister v. Salas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 19, 1986No. 85-1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this litigation before the court. In McAlister v. Salas, 442 So.2d 375 (Fla.2d DCA 1983), which we refer to in this opinion as McAlis-ter # 1, we found that an enforceable contract existed between the purchaser, McAl-ister, and the seller, Salas, and that failure to consummate the conveyance of the subject land was solely the fault of Salas. We remanded to the trial court and empowered it to determine the appropriate remedy, i.e. damages or specific performance. The trial court awarded McAlister damages and, solely for the reason set forth below,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Wilson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. HALLMARK BLDRS. v. Hickory Lakes of BrandonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westburne Supply v. Comm. Villas PartnersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Montgomery Ward Development Corp. v. Juster ex rel. estate of JusterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Montgomery Ward Development Corporation v. Doris R. JusterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API