Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvel v. City of Johnston City

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1992No. 71290Published

1DissentChief Justice Miller

The majority concludes that the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 48, pars. 60 through 69) authorizes the recovery of damages for loss of consortium by the spouse of a nonfatally injured worker. The court offers a series of reasons in support of this determination but the principal grounds are two: that recognition of the cause of action is consistent with the Structural Work Act’s broad deterrent and remedial purposes, and that recognition of the action finds support in the Act’s legislative history. In so holding, however, the majority rewrites the language of the statute and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Crafton v. Lester B. Knight & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Dralle v. RuderIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Croissant v. Joliet Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API