Redmon v. LeFevre

OPINION

DYER, Chief Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether our recent decision in Bradley v. LaPenna, Tenn., 490 S.W.2d 500 (1973), was in error in that by oversight we overlooked the *98holding in Slover v. Union Bank, 115 Tenn. 347, 89 S.W. 399 (1905).

The complaint alleged on June 1, 1964, appellant, Sylvia Redmon, was involved in an automobile accident in the State of Georgia, and later that summer employed' appellee, George LeFevre, as an attorney to represent her in an action for damages arising out of this accident. That appellee agreed to represent appellant in this matter, but…