Legal Opinion
AEL Industries, Inc. v. Loral Fairchild Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-2176PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
After a bench trial of this case on January 10-12, 1995, and after considering the testimony of the witnesses, the admitted exhibits and the arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 1
Findings of Fact
A. The Request For Proposals
1. On December 29, 1988, defendant Loral Fairchild Corporation (“Loral”) distributed a request for proposals for a subcontract on a prime contract it had entered into with the United States Air Force (“USAF”). The prime contract called for the manufacture…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Trademark Research Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Maxwell Online, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Wolff & Munier, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Leading Manufacturer Pte. Ltd. v. Bradlees Stores, Inc. (In Re Bradlees Stores, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004