Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1956No. 36231PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'J ownsend, J.

1. Special grounds of an amended motion for a new trial which are disapproved by the trial court, or which are incomplete within I hemselves, will not be passed upon by this court. Yancy v. State, 173 Ga. 685 (3) (160 S. E. 867); Cathey v. State, 28 Ga. App. 666 (4) (112 S. E. 915). A ground of a motion for new trial complaining of the illegal .admission of evidence must set forth the evidence objected to in substance. Clare v. Drexler, 152 Ga. 419 (2) (110 S. E. 176). Accordingly, special grounds 3, 5, and 18 which do not set forth the evidence sought to be excluded, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Womble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Douberly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Bedgood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Velasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API