Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 1978No. 76-199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

The defendant-appellee, Clarence Jackson, was charged with five counts of armed robbery. Prior to trial defendant moved to quash his arrest and to suppress a credit card (seized incident to a prior arrest on an unrelated charge) as well as identification testimony discovered as a result of that seizure. The trial court did not rule on the motion to quash the arrest, but did suppress the credit card and the identification testimony of witnesses discovered as a result of the seizure of the card.

The State now appeals from that order, basing its appeal solely on the contention that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. NawrockiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. The PEOPLE v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. People v. HarrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. People v. BostonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API