Legal Opinion

Le Sannom Building Corp. v. Lassen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered December 13, 1990, which inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the caption to substitute certain named individuals for "John and Jane Doe”, denied the motion of defendants Dudek and Cromwell to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (4) and stayed plaintiff’s claims for use and occupancy of the subject premises, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of consolidating this action with the action captioned Cromwell v Le Sannom Bldg. Corp. (Index No.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chazon, LLC v. MaugenestNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. 99 Commercial Street, Inc. v. LlewellynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Lansco Corp. v. KampeasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Chazon, LLC v. MaugenestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API