Legal Opinion

McMillin v. Neeley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Application by C. E. McMillin for writ of mandamus against • Mansfield M. Neely, Mayor, and others.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

O. E. McMillin was elected, 21st March, 1908, as councilman of the city of Fairmont, and was duly declared elected, took the oath of office, was admitted as a member by the city council, acted as such for months. Later, a citizen filed with the council a petition alleging that McMillin was incompetent to hold the office because of not being a free-holder at the time of his election. The council tried the matter and by a vote of five to four declared the office of councilman held by Mc-Millin as vacant, acting under section fifteen of the city charter providing that if any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Shell v. CousinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Poling v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wood v. GordonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Kahle v. PetersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Booten v. PinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Marra v. ZinkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Landes v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Brewer v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Marra v. ZinkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API