Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Huron; Beach, J. Bill by Charles E. Thompson, assignee of William H. Cooper and William Creevy, and others, against Orange Noble and the Keystone National Bank, for an accounting and the specific performance of a land contract. Complainant Thompson appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This case is a companion to that of Thompson v. Noble, ante, 19, to which we refer for a partial statement of the facts. Allusion was made in that case to a contract whereby Noble agreed to sell to Cooper and Creevy an undivided half interest in certain lands. It is this agreement, and the lands covered thereby, that are involved in this case. This contract was in writing, and by its terms Noble promised ‘ ‘ to sell, on payment of the purchase price, money, and interest, and performance of the articles in all things, and to convey an undivided one-half part of all the lands held and owned by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradford v. President of the Union Bank of TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Miller v. CoreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  3. Farber v. PurdySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Watson v. SawyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WassingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State v. DePauwSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. World Pub. Co. v. MinahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API