Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Hofstra University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant ARA Services, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated February 25, 1988, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims as against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint and cross claims are dismissed as against the defendant ARA Services, Inc.
On October 6, 1981, the plaintiff Barbara Siegel, a student at Hofstra University (hereinafter Hofstra), was injured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Solomon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Boltax v. Joy Day CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smith v. Johnson Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gibbs v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Vazquez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Zaransky v. FroccaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Peters v. Veemac Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992