Turnbull v. Giddings
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Delators applied for mandamus to compel respondents to receive certain protests, and enter tbe same on the journals of their respective bodies. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
These cases may be considered together. •The relator in the first case is a member of the Senate. Respondent Giddings is Lieutenant Governor and ex officio president of the Senate, and respondent Alward is the secretary of the Senate. The relator in the other case is a member of the House of Representatives. Respondent Tateum is also a member of the House and speaker thereof, and respondent Miller is clerk of that body. Senator Turnbull, on the 15th day of February, 1893, asked leave to present a protest against certain proceedings of the Senate, and to have the same spread upon the journal;…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- MacGregor v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Benton Harbor v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Fuchs v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Michigan Taxpayers United, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.