Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Eddy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 24, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barns, Circuit Judge.

On the 29th day of November, 1930, a contract was' entered into between R. C. Whittaker and Irene E. Whittaker, his wife, who are hereinafter referred to as the “Whittakers,” and Lavelle Bee Eddy, hereinafter referred to as “Eddy,” the principal provisions of which contract were that the Whittakers were:

' “To purchase a life membership in the Baptist Old People’s Home, at Maywood, Illinois, for the party of the second part, and in the event of the inability of the parties of the first part to so purchase said membership, to provide a life membership for the party of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Godwin v. PhiferSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Mitchell v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  4. American Securities Co. v. GoldsberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  5. Pittman v. MiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Florida Power Corp. v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Miami Bridge Co. v. Miami Beach Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Schupler v. Eastern Mortgage CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  4. Davis v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. The Kitty C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API