Legal Opinion

John Rissman & Son v. Gordon & Ferguson, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1948No. Civ. No. 764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This action was commenced by plaintiff to enjoin defendant from infringement of its claimed trade-mark, “Windbreaker”. Defendant answering, denied plaintiff was entitled to the relief prayed for and counter-claimed, praying for an injunction, against the plaintiff’s infringing its claimed trade-mark, “Windbreaker”. Each party asks for costs of the suit.

The claims of plaintiff and defendant, except for defendant’s claim of prior use, stem from a common source. On August 20, 1918, the Hilker-Weichers Manufacturing Co., a Wisconsin corporation (hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beech-Nut Packing Co. v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. Northwest Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Street & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. Warner v. Tennessee Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Woodward v. White Satin Mills CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Specialty Foods of Pittsburgh, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API