Legal Opinion
Goodson v. Public Employees Retirement System
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 2011No. Agency 900900, 900901, 900903, 900915, 900916, 900937; SC S059056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
Petitioners seek judicial review under ORS 183.482 of a final order of the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB). They contest the reduction of their retirement benefits as a result of PERB’s efforts to recoup benefit overpay-ments that petitioners had received because of an erroneous 20 percent earnings credit for 1999. The Court of Appeals certified the matter to this court under ORS 19.405. We affirm PERB’s final order.
This is a companion case to our decision today in Arken v. City of Portland, 351 Or 113, 263 P3d 975 (2011). To avoid unnecessary repetition, we will refer frequently to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Foster Group, Inc. v. City of ElginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Crockett's Interstate Towing & Transport v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022