State v. Wyatt
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, C. J.:
Wyatt was charged with producing an abortion in violation *732of NRS 201.120. The abortee testified at the preliminary hearing, but her testimony was not corroborated. For this reason the district court subsequently granted Wyatt’s petition for habeas corpus. The State has appealed from that ruling.
The issue presented to us centers upon the meaning to be given NRS 175.250 (now 175.301) which precludes conviction following a trial unless the testimony of the woman is corroborated by other evidence.1 It is the State’s contention that such corroborative evidence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re OxleyNevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Application of HutchinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Application of SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wyatt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Sonia F. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Maskaly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Eckert v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.