State v. Clark
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wilson, J., Lexington, September, 1909. cites: Charge as to evidence of an accomplice is on the facts: 48 S- C., 148; 38 S'. C., 31; 60' S. C., 527; 83 S. C., 37. cites: Error in ■charge, if favorable to defendant, is not reversible error: 50 :S. C., 52, 104; 51 S. C., 225.
1Opinion of the Court
The.opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrick.
The indictment upon- which the defendant was convicted contained three counts: 1. For breaking and entering the storehouse of M. E. Rutland, with intent to steal. 2. For burglary. 3. For petit larceny.
The finding of the grand jury was: “True bill, housebreaking and larceny. As to burglary, no bill.”
The verdict of the petit jury was: “We find him guilty of housebreaking.” From sentence upon this verdict, defendant appeals.
1 On cross-examination of M. E. Rutland, the prosecutor, defendant’s attorney asked him who had access to his…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BagwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- State v. ChristensenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- State v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.