Legal Opinion
Claim v. Rickkard Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 20, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Lahtinen, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 11, 2000, which ruled that claimant sustained a causally related consequential disability.
Claimant was employed as a carpentry supervisor on March 23, 1990 when a log fell on his right foot, breaking it. Accident, notice and causal relationship were established and workers’ compensation benefits were awarded to claimant. Hearings were held periodically before a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) to determine the continuing status of claimant’s physical disability. At a hearing held in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Diliberto v. Hickory Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Howell v. Langie Fuel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Palevsky v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Claim of Crawford v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of the Estate of Kramer v. Ultra Blend Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Hughes v. Indian Valley Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Zucker v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Skippon v. T.M. Kenney's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Muehl v. Clinton's Ditch CooperativeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.