Legal Opinion

Rolfstad, Winkjer, Suess, McKennett & Kaiser, P.C. v. Hanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1974No. Civ. 8996PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This case is the fourth in a series of appeals related to an oil well drilled within a portion of the Garrison Reservoir. The rising waters of the reservoir necessitated the construction of an earthen mound to protect the well site. This litigation has come to be more popularly known as the “Mound Cases.” Odegaard v. Investors Oil, Inc., 118 N.W.2d 362 (N.D.1962); Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc., 140 N.W.2d 349 (N.D.1966); Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc., 176 N.W.2d 643 (N.D.1970).

The respondent (the Rolfstad firm) recovered in the district court on its suit for attorney fees and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Kee v. RedlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Feil v. WishekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hoge v. Burleigh County Water Management DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. John C. Frank, Plaintiff-Cross v. Victoria BloomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API