Phillips v. Beilsten
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
The judgment át bar adjudicates the issues tendered in two actions which were consolidated for trial pursuant to stipulation: (1) an action brought by Robert W. Phillips (appellant) against Mr. and Mrs. Harry L. Beilsten (respondents) seeking specific performance of a certain contract whereby the parties agreed to an exchange of their respective interests in certain parcels ■ of real property, and (2) an action brought by respondents Beilstens seeking rescission of the same contract upon the ground of fraud in the inducement. The trial court decreed a rescission and granted Beilstens a money…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Beatty v. Pacific States Savings and Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Gee v. American Realty & Construction Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- McKinley v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959