Legal Opinion

Hanselman v. Wayne County Concealed Weapon Licensing Board

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1985No. Docket No. 80182Published

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us upon remand by the Supreme Court. Originally, in Hanselman v Killeen, 112 Mich App 275; 316 NW2d 237 (1982), we held that the Wayne County Concealed Weapon Licensing Board was a state agency for the purpose of applying the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act and that, therefore, the board had to comply with the provisions of the APA.

The board appealed and the Supreme Court reversed in a lengthy opinion, Hanselman v Wayne County Concealed Weapon Licensing Board, 419 Mich 168; 351 NW2d 544 (1984). The Supreme Court held that the board was not an agency…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hanselman v. Wayne County Concealed Weapon Licensing BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bay County Concealed Weapons Licensing Board v. GastaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hanselman v. KilleenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API