Fox v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
The enactment of subdivision (b) of section 3121 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, in effect on September 1, 1963, has been said to be a backward step because under that newly enacted provision there is no requirement for a compulsory exchange of medical reports. A plaintiff can avoid disclosing medical reports in his control where, on his physical examination by the defendant, he merely refrains from making any demand for the report of such examination. The section simply puts the onus upon the defendant seeking a physical examination to provide a copy of the report thereof to the party…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mack v. 842 Myrtle Ave. Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benedict v. MisenerNew York Supreme Court · 1965