Legal Opinion

Orbary McKinnon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 2017No. Case 5D16-3167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Orbary McKinnon (the defendant) appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his “Motion for Post-Conviction Relief, Newly Discovered Evidence,” filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

The defendant filed the instant rule 3.850 motion seeking post-conviction relief based on newly-discovered evidence. In support of his motion, the defendant attached an affidavit from his co-defendant, Norman Lockley, stating that the defendant had not participated in the underlying drug offenses.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. McLin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Nordelo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. FRANK ROBERTS, III vs STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API