Legal Opinion

Clum v. Seksinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, inter alia, to restrict the respondent mother from relocating to York, Pennsylvania, with the parties’ child, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated April 9, 1998, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the father’s application which was, in effect, for downward modification of child support, upon a finding that the mother interfered with the father’s visitation rights, and suspended the obligation of the father to pay child support.

Ordered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Martinez v. KonczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Martinez v. KonczewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hecht v. HechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Caroll v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ledgin v. LedginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Smith v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Mazzola v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API