Legal Opinion

Heege v. Fruin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis County Circuit Court, Edwards, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

The defendants were contractors with the Missouri Pacific Railway company for the construction of a second track-from Laclede to Kirkwood. J. N. Niday was a sub-contractor under them for a part of the work. The plaintiff sued Niday by attachment for an indebtedness of $755.94, and summoned the present defendants as garnishees. Issues upon the alleged indebtedness of the defendants to Niday were submitted to a jury, who gave their verdict for the defendants.

There was testimony tending to prove that the garnishees had received from the company on account of the work done by Niday, the sum of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weil v. TylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  2. Scales v. Southern Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. Empire Soap Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Joseph, Nelke & Co. v. BoldridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Ritter v. Boston Underwriters InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Harmon v. MenkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Aly v. Hanzada for Import & Export Company, LTDDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API