Rhone v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This conviction was for violating the local option law.
The information was attacked for several reasons, none of which we think present any merit. The matters presented by the record have been so frequently passed on we deem it unnecessary to discuss them. The information is valid under the decisions. See Stephens v. State, 97 S. W. Rep., 483; Key v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 77; Starnes v. State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep., 403; 107 S. W. Rep., 550, and Wade v. State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep., 608; 108 S. W. Rep., 376.
Appellant objected to the introduction of the judge’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Starnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927